The P&emic Uncovered Ways to Speed Up Science

The p&emic highlighted broad problems in research: that many studies were hyped, error-ridden, or even fraudulent, & that misinformation could spread rapidly. But it also demonstrated what was possible.

While it usually takes years to test drugs against a new disease, this time it took less than one to find several vaccines & treatments. Once, scientists discovered new strains of viruses only after an outbreak had already happened, but now they were able to use sewage samples to predict outbreaks in advance.

Not everyone saw the speed of these advancements positively: The belief that vaccines were “rushed,” for example, was one of the most common reasons that people delayed taking them. Many people believe that doing science quickly would mean doing away with st&ards & creating research that’s sloppy or even dangerous.

But that isn’t always true, & the urgency of Covid-19 led many people to adapt, produce, & improve research at a quality & speed that few expected. Not only could we avoid those trade-offs, but we could improve science in ways that make it faster—& the p&emic has shown us how.

Collect routine data

Within six months of the outbreak, there were more than 30,000 genome sequences of the coronavirus—whereas in the same amount of time in 2003, scientists were able to get only a single sequence of the SARS virus.

The speed at which coronavirus genomes were sequenced is a success story, but it didn’t show us the whole picture. While the UK used a large genomics program to sequence almost 3 million coronavirus genomes, many countries sequenced a few thous& in total, some less than a hundred.

Disparities like this are common. In many places, over a range of topics, lots of data goes unmeasured or missed: the prevalence of mental illness, national GDP, & even registrations of deaths & their causes. Instead, it has to be estimated with wide ranges. 

It’s difficult & expensive for small research groups to collect data on their own, so they tend to collect what’s convenient rather than comprehensive. For example, in psychology, research is often “WEIRD”—coming from participants who are White, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, & Democratic. In history, data comes from wherever records are common; in economics, where businesses have registered detailed accounts of their income & spending.

Different researchers measure the same data in different ways. Some people are contacted by multiple research groups looking at the same questions, while others go unseen.

Without data that’s measured in a st&ard way, it’s difficult to Reply questions about whether things are different & why those differences might be. For example, is anxiety more common in richer countries, or more likely to be detected? Since the condition goes undiagnosed in many countries & surveys are rare, we don’t have a clear Reply.

This clues us to one way to speed up science: Huge institutions, such as governments & international organizations, should collect & share data routinely instead of leaving the burden to small research groups. It’s a classic example of “economies of scale,” where larger organizations can use their resources to build the tools to measure, share, & maintain data more easily & cheaply, & at a scale that smaller groups are unable to.

Source link
#P&emic #Uncovered #Ways #Speed #Science

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Plz deactivate the ad blocker and contribute to us.